[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 00/54] 2.6.21-stable review
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:21:27AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the release.
> There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the
> Cc: line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email
> to add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
> also email us.

I'm wondering if it makes sense to do more regular releases of -stable
so that the patchqueue doesn't build up so much. It's painful
to sit down and review lots of patches in one sitting.
Additionally, with lots of change, it's a real pain to figure out
"which one of the 50 patches that went into the last -stable
makes my machine not boot" (which I had to do recently).

Or maybe cc: the reviewer list when patches get added?

Or maybe both?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-08 19:31    [W:0.419 / U:0.760 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site