lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Another version of cleanfile/cleanpatch
From
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:19:56PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Oleg Verych wrote:
> >
> > Because of that, i think, following is redundant:
> >
> > - to check for binary files
>
> find . -type f | xargs cleanfile

What about patches?

Anyway, by agreement (with myself), i've stopped on having per-file-name
division (prev. message first patch, and that was last design remaining
from cleanfile/cleanpatch). So:

for f in $*
do clean-whitespace $f 2>&1 >/dev/null
done

But this doesn't look like interactive usage, which i've concluded.
Plus copy is saved in $f.clean file, so user can `diff -u` to see any
destruction and possibly report a bug.

[]
> > - scan whole file for long lines, with useless bunch of messages about
> > ones. Useless, because script doesn't fix that, it can't do that!
>
> Still useful to let the human know what is going on, and why.

What i've done was `cleanpatch patch-2.6.21-rc4-rc5`
That's where usefulness comes from ;)

> -hpa
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-08 03:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans