[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs

    On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:

    > On Wednesday, June 6, 2007 3:13 pm Justin Piszcz wrote:
    >> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
    >>> On Wednesday, June 6, 2007 3:03 pm Justin Piszcz wrote:
    >>>> Mem: 8039620k total, 7936472k used, 103148k free, 708k
    >>>> buffers Mem: 8039608k total, 969380k used, 7070228k free,
    >>>> 1232k buffers
    >>>> I am curious, why does the patch != the mem=8832M?
    >>> I'm not sure... can you post your e820 map from boot and the
    >>> contents of /proc/mtrr? Maybe my patch is trimming off a few too
    >>> many pages, or maybe 8832M isn't quite right and actually ends up
    >>> leaving you with a few uncached pages.
    >>> Jesse
    >> Unless you know of some other way I can capture the output, it only
    >> starts showing the dmesg from [50..] onward.
    > Did you boot the kernel with the 'debug' option? Maybe your dmesg
    > buffer is too small (there's a config option for that iirc).
    > Jesse

    Nope, I booted with only netconsole= options. I have a lot of HW in the
    box and I guess the buffer is too small. Not sure where to change it in
    the kernel. Looking..
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-07 00:29    [W:0.022 / U:2.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site