[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Patch 04/18] include/linux/logfs.h
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 17:49 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > It would be better if GCC had a 'nopadding' attribute which gave us
> > what we need without the _extra_ implications about alignment.
> That's impossible; removing the padding from a struct
> _will_ make accesses to its members unaligned (think
> about arrays of that struct).

It _might_ make accesses to _some_ of its members unaligned.

That's why I said 'without the __EXTRA__ implications about alignment'.

Obviously the lack of padding has its own implications, but we don't
necessarily need to assume that the struct may be at arbitrary


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-05 17:57    [W:0.121 / U:1.156 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site