lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.22-rcX Transmeta/APM regression
Date
On Saturday 30 June 2007 05:03, linux@horizon.com wrote:

> Anyway, the patch which introduces the problem is the aptly named 3ebad:
> 3ebad59056: [PATCH] x86: Save and restore the fixed-range MTRRs of the BSP
> when suspending
>
> 2.6.22-rc6 plus that one commit reverted successfully does APM suspend
> (and resume) for me.

Mr.Linux, Does that patch fix it?

-Andi

i386: Check if CPU has MTRRs before trying to save them

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
@@ -734,8 +734,11 @@ void mtrr_ap_init(void)
*/
void mtrr_save_state(void)
{
- int cpu = get_cpu();
+ int cpu;

+ if (!cpu_has_mtrr)
+ return;
+ cpu = get_cpu();
if (cpu == 0)
mtrr_save_fixed_ranges(NULL);
else

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-30 11:29    [W:1.238 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site