[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching

> >What you do with AppArmor, instead of addressing the problem, is just
> >redefine the environment along the lines of "set your house into a rock
> >wall so there is only one path to it".
> Harrumph. Those analogies sound good but aren't a very good guide.
> Let's take a concrete example. Consider the following fragment of a
> policy for Mozilla:
> allow ~/.mozilla
> deny ~
> Ignore the syntax; the goal is to allow Mozilla to access files under
> ~/.mozilla but nothing else under my home directory. This is a perfectly
> reasonable policy fragment to want to enforce. And enforcing it in
> the obvious way using pathname-based access control is not a ridiculous
> thing to do.

Unfortunately, mozilla needs temporary files IIRC. And when you add
allow /tmp

to your config files, you get system where your fellow users can
ln HOME/.ssh/identity /tmp/to-steal (or
ln HOME/.profile /tmp/put-evil-code-here)
and AA protection is not effective any more.

Would _you_ do this mistake?

Would our users do this mistake?

Is it right to provide them with auto-learning tools to make this
mistake really easy?

(cesky, pictures)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-29 14:33    [W:0.254 / U:4.212 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site