Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:59:58 +0900 | From | Neil Booth <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions |
| |
Al Viro wrote:-
> If you want to test ICE recognition, right now only the following places > are checking for it: > * bitfield width > * __attribute__((aligned(<number>))) > * __attribute__((address_space(<number>))) > * [<index>] in designators within initializer list > * [<index> ... <index>] - ditto, gccism > > That's it. We can use it elsewhere too, but that's a separate bunch of > patches (trivial to do now).
Bah. You don't escape that easily :)
extern int a; struct b { unsigned int b1:(1,2); }; struct c { unsigned int c1: 1 ? 2: a++; };
are both invalid yet undiagnosed.
Neil. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |