Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:55:43 +0800 | From | gshan <> | Subject | Re: bugs in __schedule() |
| |
Satyam Sharma wrote: > On 6/26/07, gshan <gshan@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: >> Thanks, Satyam. So I can replace the tasklet with kernel thread? > > That depends on what you want to do ... > > [ BTW: I should correct a typo in my original reply -- I should've said > "scheduling while atomic", and not "scheduling while interrupts disabled" > because interrupts are _not_ disabled in bottom halves, and from your > stack backtrace it was evident that a tasklet was executing. :-) ] I mean kernel thread could sleep, but tasklet can't. If so, it meet my requirements. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |