[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 21/26] Slab defragmentation: support dentry defragmentation
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > + * objects.
> > + */
> > + abort = 1;
> It's unobvious why the entire shrink effort is abandoned if one busy dentry
> is encountered. Please flesh the comment out explaining this.

If one item is busy then we cannot reclaim the slab. So what would be the
use of continuing efforts. I thought I put that into the description? I
can put that into the code too.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-26 20:27    [W:0.321 / U:5.192 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site