[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    On Monday, June 25, 2007 8:29:35 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
    > Is there an is_cpu() check to differentiate between those? Anyway I'd
    > rather not enable it unless we see reports though... So far I've only seen
    > reports of this problem on some recent Intel based systems.

    Oh, and FYI I've seen new systems with a default mapping type of WB, with a
    few uncached holes for MMIO. That means PAT will be absolutely required on
    those systems if we want to use WC for the framebuffer or other memory. I
    hope it's ready for mainline soon...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-26 05:33    [W:0.117 / U:0.512 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site