[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
Tomasz Kłoczko kirjoitti:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Jun 24 2007 21:24, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>>> Try to answer on question "ALSA or OSS ?" using *only* technical
>>> arguments.
>> Ok: The OSS cs46xx driver did not support the rear 2 channels.
The cs46xx OSS driver in the kernel is not our work. This discussion is
about _our_ OSS 4.0 so the above is not a valid argument.
> Yes it is true .. OSS (Hannu tree) dos not provide rear 2 channels in
> cs46xx driver because .. in this OSS tree there is no cs46xx driver :>
The driver for cs46xx/cs4280 devices in OSS 4.0 is called cs4280.c. It's
based on the same sample sources from Crystal than the kernel cs46xx
one. It doesn't support the rear channels any better which could be an
argument. However OSS is now an open source community project so anybody
has freedom to fix this problem.

Best regards,

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-25 22:35    [W:0.111 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site