lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: hsm violation
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:32:22 +0200 Enrico Sardi <enricoss@tiscali.it> wrote:
>> [ 61.176000] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0x2 SErr 0x0 action 0x2
>> frozen
>> [ 61.176000] ata1.00: (spurious completions during NCQ issue=0x0
>> SAct=0x2 FIS=005040a1:00000004)

..

>
> It's not obvious (to me) whether this is a driver bug, a hardware bug,
> expected-normal-behaviour or what - those diagnostics (which we get to
> see distressingly frequently) are pretty obscure.

The spurious completions during NCQ error is indicating that the drive
has indicated it's completed NCQ command tags which weren't outstanding.
It's normally a result of a bad NCQ implementation on the drive.
Technically we can live with it, but it's rather dangerous (if it
indicates completions for non-outstanding commands, how do we know it
doesn't indicate completions for actually outstanding commands that
aren't actually completed yet..)

--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-24 21:45    [W:0.136 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site