[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 09:57:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Sory Alan but I don't want philosophical/historical discuss.
> > Try to answer on question "ALSA or OSS ?" using *only* technical arguments.
> We dropped OSS for ALSA for technical reasons. Those being that ALSA
> - has a better audio API

You mean the undocumented, 100% ioctl one? With one ioctl to write
interleaved sound, one for non-interleaved sound, in addition to
setting interleaved or not in the configuration? I should check one
day which one wins.

Or the "library"? Don't get me started on this one.

I take your word about the fact that the kernel side is better. The
userland side, not so much.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-25 00:45    [W:0.136 / U:39.536 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site