Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 23 Jun 2007 02:26:43 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: Kconfig troubles when using menuconfig - Was: [patch]Re: [linux-usb-devel] linux-2.6.22-rc5-gf1518a0 build #300 failed in zc0301_core.c |
| |
Hi,
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> But why? Let it do just one thing, and do it well. Is their > any requirement anywhere that requires us to give a dual > meaning to these menuconfig objects -- i.e. to also control > the inclusion / exclusion of code from the kernel as well as > also for the presentation + user interface purpose that it > currently serves?
This getting ridiculous. :-( You're the one who is attaching a new meaning to it. Any config symbol has multiple meanings depending on the context, the menu property only changes _one_ of them, you want to drastically redefine it and that's not going to happen.
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |