lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PCI: also read revision ID for sparc64, ppc, read class at the same time
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:12:55AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
>
> Grant Grundler wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 01:12:21PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> >> Since the PCI bus class and revision are in the same dword, we
> >> can fill in both in the same read.
> >>
> >> Other non-x86 arches use different methods to fill in these values,
> >> make sure to adjust those too.
> > Yeah, this looks good to me.
> > I didn't know ppc and sparc had their own methods for device discovery.
> > Acked-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
> > thanks,
> > grant
> >> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c | 2 ++
> >> arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c | 1 +
> >> drivers/pci/probe.c | 4 +---
> >> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> >> index 249cca2..b2c55ca 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> >> @@ -367,8 +367,10 @@ struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct device_node
> >> *node,
> >> sprintf(pci_name(dev), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d", pci_domain_nr(bus),
> >> dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> >> dev->class = get_int_prop(node, "class-code", 0);
> >> + dev->revision = get_int_prop(node, "revision-id", 0);
> >> DBG(" class: 0x%x\n", dev->class);
> >> + DBG(" revision: 0x%x\n", dev->revision);
> >> dev->current_state = 4; /* unknown power state */
> >> dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
> >> diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c
> >> index 38a32bc..759cc20 100644
> >> --- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c
> >> +++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c
> >> @@ -448,6 +448,7 @@ struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct pci_pbm_info
> >> *pbm,
> >> */
> >> pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_CLASS_REVISION, &class);
> >> dev->class = class >> 8;
> >> + dev->revision = class & 0xff;
> >> sprintf(pci_name(dev), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d", pci_domain_nr(bus),
> >> dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> >> index 0fdb71d..a574b7f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> >> @@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ static int pci_setup_device(struct pci_dev * dev)
> >> dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn));
> >> pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_CLASS_REVISION, &class);
> >> + dev->revision = class & 0xff;
> >> class >>= 8; /* upper 3 bytes */
> >> dev->class = class;
> >> class >>= 8;
> >> @@ -918,9 +919,6 @@ pci_scan_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
> >> dev->cfg_size = pci_cfg_space_size(dev);
> >> dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
> >> - /* read the PCI revision: 1 byte */
> >> - pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_REVISION_ID, &dev->revision);
> >> -
> >> /* Assume 32-bit PCI; let 64-bit PCI cards (which are far rarer)
> >> set this higher, assuming the system even supports it. */
> >> dev->dma_mask = 0xffffffff;
>
>
> Greg, did you end up pulling this patch? If you pulled my first patch, then
> you *must* pull this one too. Otherwise a lot of drivers will fail on
> ppc/sparc64.

Care to merge this with your first one and resend it so that no one
doing a 'git bisect' will hit a bad point in the tree?

If you do that, a resend of all of the patches in this series would be
wise, to make sure that I didn't mess up in applying them.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-22 21:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans