Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:24:37 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: How to improve the quality of the kernel? |
| |
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:33:13AM +0300, Al Boldi wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 04:41:28PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote: > > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > Talk is cheap, but unless YOU will do it your emails will only be a > > > > waste of bandwidth. > > > > > > Thanks, and good luck with involving people with this kind of response! > > > > It's simply how kernel development works - not by talking but by doing > > the work. > > This sounds like a brute-force approach, akin to hacking. > > I think it's much more productive to analyze the problem and then design a > solution accordingly.
Sure, that's part of creating your solution.
But when you've analyzed the problem and designed a solution, YOU have to implement it.
> > Many people thought long-term maintainance for 2.6.16 wouldn't make sense. > > And I didn't start long discussions whether we need regression tracking - > > I simply did it. > > Maybe because you are a PRO. >...
No, simply because I got my ass up.
> Thanks! > Al
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |