lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Intel IOMMU 06/10] Avoid memory allocation failures in dma map api calls
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 23:37 -0700, Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 08:29:34AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 23:11 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Also, the other iommu code you pointed me to, was happy to fail, it did
> > > not attempt to use the emergency reserves.
> >
> > Is the same behavior acceptable here?
>
> I would say it is. Failure is a part of life.
>
> If you have a (small) mempool with 16 pages or so, that should give you
> plenty megabytes of io-space to get out of a tight spot. That is, you
> can queue many pages with that. If it is depleted you know you have at
> least that many pages outstanding. So failing will just delay the next
> pages.
>
> Throughput is not a key issue when that low on memory, a guarantee of
> progress is.

Andrew,
Can you please queue all the other patches except this one for your
next MM release? (Yes, We can safely drop this patch without any issues in applying
rest of the patches).


-thanks,
Anil Keshavamurthy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-21 21:59    [W:0.078 / U:1.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site