[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
    On Jun 21, 2007, jimmy bahuleyan <> wrote:

    > There, that right there, wouldn't it again require a 'nod' from all
    > those who have contributed to the kernel (because at the time they did,
    > the license was GPLv2 without any additions)?

    That's my understanding, yes, but IANAL.

    Similarly, any GPLv2 and GPLv3 projects that wish to cooperate with
    each other could introduce mutual additional permissions in the way I
    suggested, even if neither GPLv2 nor GPLv3 themselves make such
    provisions. This is a decision that copyright holders can make, in
    very much the same way that they can make their decisions as to
    permitting relicensing under newer versions of the GPL, or even older
    versions of the GPL.

    BTW, I should probably have made clear that, as usual, I was speaking
    my own mind, not speaking on behalf of FSFLA or Red Hat, with whom I'm
    associated, and certainly not on behalf of FSF, with whom I'm not
    associated. Just in case this wasn't clear yet ;-)

    Alexandre Oliva
    FSF Latin America Board Member
    Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{,}
    Free Software Evangelist oliva@{,}
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-21 19:55    [W:0.020 / U:10.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site