[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 2/8] 2.6.22-rc3 perfmon2 : Debug messages added
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 01:28:50PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > After commenting on your first set of patches, I've been using it a little
> > > more. In my use, these debugging messages weren't very helpful because
> > > "pfm_file_ops" can indicate pfm_mmap, pfm_read, pfm_poll, etc. Could
> > > these be changed to be more specific based on the function they're in?
> > >
> > the PFM_DBG() macro adds the CPU, function name and line number to the
> > printed string.
> >
> That's not the case in what I currently have in my tree, I'll go back and
> see what I'm missing.

Bizarre. Becuase if you've disabled CONFIG_PERFMON_DEBUG, then all the PFM_DBG()
are removed.

> What's the current status of the perfmon2 patchset that Robert's work is
> based on?

Well, I have been hacking on it a lot especially to allow Oprofile and
perfmon2 to co-exist (mutual-exclusion). I am hoping to release something
before I fly to OLS next week. I have started integrating Robert's patches.
I also have to integrate IBM's Cell support patch.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-20 22:43    [W:0.050 / U:6.528 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site