[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 2/8] 2.6.22-rc3 perfmon2 : Debug messages added
    On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 01:28:50PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
    > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Stephane Eranian wrote:
    > > > After commenting on your first set of patches, I've been using it a little
    > > > more. In my use, these debugging messages weren't very helpful because
    > > > "pfm_file_ops" can indicate pfm_mmap, pfm_read, pfm_poll, etc. Could
    > > > these be changed to be more specific based on the function they're in?
    > > >
    > > the PFM_DBG() macro adds the CPU, function name and line number to the
    > > printed string.
    > >
    > That's not the case in what I currently have in my tree, I'll go back and
    > see what I'm missing.

    Bizarre. Becuase if you've disabled CONFIG_PERFMON_DEBUG, then all the PFM_DBG()
    are removed.

    > What's the current status of the perfmon2 patchset that Robert's work is
    > based on?

    Well, I have been hacking on it a lot especially to allow Oprofile and
    perfmon2 to co-exist (mutual-exclusion). I am hoping to release something
    before I fly to OLS next week. I have started integrating Robert's patches.
    I also have to integrate IBM's Cell support patch.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-20 22:43    [W:0.025 / U:9.872 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site