Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:06:45 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF |
| |
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:59:23 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Andrew Morton - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:54:22PM -0700] > | On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:34:03 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote: > | > | > | That patch is DOA, methinks. > | > | > | > > | > Andrew, what does it mean - "DOA"? Dead on arrival? > | > | yes - I dropped it. > | > > But that could lead to rejection of my code-style-conversion patch... > Should I remake them?
Actually I've rebuilt those patches four times already. People keep changing stuff.
> Actually Jan was right, the current state of UDF (without his patches) > could lead to lost blocks and his patch must be just fixed I think.
sure. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |