lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:59:23 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:

> [Andrew Morton - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:54:22PM -0700]
> | On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:34:03 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> |
> | > | That patch is DOA, methinks.
> | > |
> | >
> | > Andrew, what does it mean - "DOA"? Dead on arrival?
> |
> | yes - I dropped it.
> |
>
> But that could lead to rejection of my code-style-conversion patch...
> Should I remake them?

Actually I've rebuilt those patches four times already. People keep
changing stuff.

> Actually Jan was right, the current state of UDF (without his patches)
> could lead to lost blocks and his patch must be just fixed I think.

sure.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-02 09:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans