Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:49:56 +0200 | From | Anders Larsen <> | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| |
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:54:56 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I don't know any law that requires tivoization.
Not exactly laws, but pretty close:
Credit-card payment terminals are subject to strict security certification, where it has to be ensured that
a) the user cannot tinker with the device without rendering it unusable for its original purpose (electronic payments), and
b) the manufacturer is able to update the device _in_ _the_ _field_.
Those are hard requirements imposed by the banks and credit-card companies.
We _are_ allowed to disclose the source code (and we do, of course) so that it can be used for other purposes, and of course the user can modify it. But there's just no way she would be (legally) able to run the modified software in the same device for the original purpose.
With the (current draft of) GPLv3 we could not legally use Linux on such devices.
Cheers Anders
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |