[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    Alexandre Oliva wrote:
    > On Jun 17, 2007, "Gabor Czigola" <> wrote:
    > > I wonder why the linux kernel development community couldn't propose
    > > an own GPL draft (say v2.2) that is "as free as v2" and that includes
    > > some ideas (from v3) that are considered as good (free, innovative, in
    > > the spirit of whatever etc.) by the majority of the kernel developers.
    > For one, because the text of the GPL is copyrighted by the FSF, and
    > licensed without permission for modification. And that's as it should
    > be, you don't want others to modify the terms of the license you chose
    > for your code, do you?


    Under what circumstances would it be possible to receive permission for

    Thanks for being GPL!


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-17 22:23    [W:0.020 / U:1.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site