lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading andmanipulation,pathname matching
From
Date

Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:44:08AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Can the daemon using inotify access to all pathnames in all process's
> > namespaces?
>
> I don't see why not, do you?
>
> > Are the namespace the daemon has and the namespace of pathnames
> > notified via inotify always the same?
>
> If they are in the same namespace, then yes, they will as far as I can
> tell. Do you think this is incorrect?

At least, I think SELinux's "make relabel" can't relabel
files that are not in the namespace of "make" process.

I don't know how to use inotify, but what I worried is ...

If there are cases they are in different namespace,
it is impossible to relabel using userland daemon
(i.e. deferred-relabeling won't work)
unless all pathnames of all namespaces are somehow
accessible via inotify.

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-16 18:47    [W:0.197 / U:1.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site