lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    Date
    On Friday 15 June 2007 15:28:29 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
    > On Jun 15, 2007, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> wrote:
    > > On Thursday 14 June 2007 22:25:57 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
    > >> Is the signature not derived from the bits in the GPLed component, as
    > >> much as it is derived from the key?
    > >
    > > Actually, you can't copyright, trademark, or patent a number.
    >
    > Agreed. And this counter-argument of yours is a distraction.
    >
    > I was careful to not talk about "derived work".

    "Is the signature not derived from X as much as it is derived from Y."

    "I was careful to not talk about "derived work"."

    Which personality of yours am I currently addressing?

    > Please read it again
    > under this clarification (that I'm pretty sure I'd already made
    > before, but it's getting hard to keep track of everything in this
    > thread ;-)

    I'm going to stop feeding the troll now...

    Rob
    --
    "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
    - Ken Thompson.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-16 03:15    [W:4.287 / U:0.240 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site