[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    > This is the main reason I dislike GPLwhatever: there is no notion
    > of "orginal author". You might have written 99% of the code, that

    Every literary work (including thus software) has an author, and that
    author has certain rights which are implicit in them being author.

    > doesn't matter. You have no rights whatsoever once you release
    > something under the GPL (no more than ANYOne else).

    Wrong. The author has a collection of rights which vary by jurisdiction
    but which are primarily governed by the Berne Convention and its sequels
    notably TRIPS.

    > The GPL is nice for the community, and for the users - but very,
    > very bad towards it's authors (taking all and every right you might
    > have). If John Doe wants to re-release the whole kernel under

    You must be using a different GPL to the rest of us.

    > GPLv3, then all he needs is a website and some bandwidth.

    And a very good lawyer (oh and a GPL3 as there isn't one yet...)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-15 01:39    [W:0.029 / U:0.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site