Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 | From | David Woodhouse <> | Date | Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:24:55 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 21:29 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote: > Agreed. However, AFAICT, TiVO meets the provisions of the GPLv2 - they make > the source of the GPL'd part of their system available. (And I'm not going to > get into arguments over whether kernel modules are "derivative works" or not, > since those invariably end up with "They aren't, even though we think they > should be")
Who cares about whether the module is a derivative work? That's only relevant when you distribute the module as a separate work. When you ship a combined work including both the kernel and the module in question, it's a _whole_ lot easier to interpret the GPL.
-- dwmw2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |