lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: libertas (private) ioctls vs. nl80211


On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > I suspect that the probability of your proposal succeeding would be increased
> > if you could prepare a patch...
>
> Here we go:

I don't mind ripping them out, but it makes sense only if people are
actually signed up to implementing this on a higher layer. As such, I'd
need to get a sign-off from somebody actually involved in wireless mesh
stuff etc.

Please? I do agree that the private iwpriv interface seems to be totally
the wrong thing to do, but I want to see this as a first step towards a
better situation, rather than just a "remove code that is ugly" issue!

Comments?

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-14 20:27    [W:0.602 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site