Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:23:11 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: libertas (private) ioctls vs. nl80211 |
| |
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > I suspect that the probability of your proposal succeeding would be increased > > if you could prepare a patch... > > Here we go:
I don't mind ripping them out, but it makes sense only if people are actually signed up to implementing this on a higher layer. As such, I'd need to get a sign-off from somebody actually involved in wireless mesh stuff etc.
Please? I do agree that the private iwpriv interface seems to be totally the wrong thing to do, but I want to see this as a first step towards a better situation, rather than just a "remove code that is ugly" issue!
Comments?
Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |