lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRE: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)
    Date
    From
    > -----Message d'origine-----
    > De : linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
    > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de
    > Miguel Figueiredo
    > Envoyé : 11 juin 2007 20:30
    >
    > Hi all,
    >
    > some results based on massing_intr.c by Satoru, can be found
    > on http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/massive_intr.c
    >
    >
    > I know that other people, who read lkml, also tested the same
    > way, it would be nice if they also post their data.
    >

    For the pleasure of comparing CPU schedulers, both CFS v16 & full CK2 patched pre-built kernels for Fedora 7 using latest build 3194 are now available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca

    There is also a not yet fully tuned YUM repository configuration file available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca/kernel/fedora/alt-sched.repo
    Although I suggest you download the rpm's directly from the web page & install both manually using rpm -ivh --force

    Have fun.

    - vin
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-13 03:39    [W:0.031 / U:1.316 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site