lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)
Date
From
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de
> Miguel Figueiredo
> Envoyé : 11 juin 2007 20:30
>
> Hi all,
>
> some results based on massing_intr.c by Satoru, can be found
> on http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/massive_intr.c
>
>
> I know that other people, who read lkml, also tested the same
> way, it would be nice if they also post their data.
>

For the pleasure of comparing CPU schedulers, both CFS v16 & full CK2 patched pre-built kernels for Fedora 7 using latest build 3194 are now available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca

There is also a not yet fully tuned YUM repository configuration file available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca/kernel/fedora/alt-sched.repo
Although I suggest you download the rpm's directly from the web page & install both manually using rpm -ivh --force

Have fun.

- vin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-13 03:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans