Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:32:46 +0300 | From | Tarkan Erimer <> | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@netone.net.tr> wrote: > > >> [...] Just, I asked simple question and included a simple example in >> it. [...] >> > > actually, what you said was this: > > " I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License" > the OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL > compatible.). " > Why don't you include the last sentence I wrote: "So,we should have more fruits (like ZFS,DTrace etc.) ;-) " So, that's why I said it. Because, as all the time, we did it: Importing and exporting codes to/from different open source projects.
> and to that the answer was: > > " The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not want to > accept GPLv3 [...] " > > in other words: your hypothetical is false today. You called us to do a > specific action, but why did you then include a factually false > 'example' to underline that point of yours? Or if you simply did not > know about the OpenSolaris community's position beforehand, why dont you > just admit that and withdraw from that line of argument gracefully? > > Ingo >
As I mentioned in my previous posts: This is **not** in the hands of the "OpenSolaris Community" to make and apply such decision. Sun itself **will decide** it. Also, there are strong indications that Sun is very interested to make "OpenSolaris" at least "Dual-Licensed" with GPLv3.
Regards,
Tarkan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |