lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: 2.6.21 numa policy and huge pages not working
    From
    Date
    On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 21:10 -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
    > On Tue, 15 May 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:41:06PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
    > > > prior to 2.6.21 i could "numactl --interleave=all" and use SHM_HUGETLB and
    > > > the interleave policy would be respected. as of 2.6.21 it doesn't seem to
    > > > respect the policy on SHM_HUGETLB request.
    > > > see test program below.
    > > > output from pre-2.6.21:
    > > > 2ab196200000 interleave=0-3 file=/2\040(deleted) huge dirty=32 N0=8 N1=8 N2=8 N3=8
    > > > 2ab19a200000 default file=/SYSV00000000\040(deleted) dirty=16384 active=0 N0=4096 N1=4096 N2=4096 N3=4096
    > > > output from 2.6.21:
    > > > 2b49b1c00000 default file=/10\040(deleted) huge dirty=32 N3=32
    > > > 2b49b5c00000 default file=/SYSV00000000\040(deleted) dirty=16384 active=0 N0=4096 N1=4096 N2=4096 N3=4096
    > > > was this an intentional behaviour change? it seems to be only affecting
    > > > SHM_HUGETLB allocations. (i haven't tested hugetlbfs yet.)
    > > > run with "numactl --interleave=all ./shmtest"
    > >
    > > This was not intentional. I'll search for where it broke.
    >
    > ok i've narrowed it some... maybe.

    Thanks a lot for the detailed information. I am on it.

    --
    Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
    IBM Linux Technology Center

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-11 18:25    [W:0.021 / U:0.620 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site