[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Hi Neil,

Neil Brown wrote:
> On Saturday June 9, wrote:
>> Hi,
>> As we know the forthcoming GPL V3 will be not compatible with the GPL V2
>> and Linux Kernel is GPL V2 only.
>> So, another point is, which is previously mentioned by Linus and others,
>> that if it is decided to upgrade the Linux Kernel's License to GPL V3,
>> it is needed the permission of all the maintainers permission who
>> contributed to the Linux Kernel and there are a lot of lost or dead
>> maintainers. Which makes it impossible to get all the maintainers'
>> permission.
> You don't need the permission of maintainers. You need the permission
> of copyright owners. The two groups overlap, but are not the same.
> Dead people cannot own anything, even copyright. Their estate
> probably can. I don't think it is theoretically impossible to get
> everyone's permission, though it may be quite close to practically
> impossible.
So, does it mean we can change the license of the dead people's code ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-10 10:51    [W:0.599 / U:15.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site