Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:54:39 +0200 | From | Carlo Wood <> | Subject | ide0=noprobe, hda=noprobe, hda=none ignored? |
| |
I've been trying for months to get my box to boot faster by ignoring the not connected hda/hdb (ide0).
ansset:~>dmesg | egrep '(noprobe|ide0|hda|hdb)'
Kernel command line: root=/dev/hde3 ro ide0=noprobe ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd800-0xd807, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio Probing IDE interface ide0... hda: IRQ probe failed (0xfffffdb8) etc.
or
Kernel command line: root=/dev/hde3 ro hda=none hdb=none ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd800-0xd807, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio Probing IDE interface ide0... hda: IRQ probe failed (0xfffffdb8)
same for hda=noprobe hdb=noprobe
Nothing helps.
Is this a bug or not? I'd think that saying "noprobe" means "do NOT probe" - but it probes anyway.
The documentation also tells me that =none should CERTAINLY make it ignore the non-existant drives - but it keeps probing.
Shouldn't an explicitely added kernel parameter be taken a little bit more serious by the kernel? Independent on whether or not a drive is detected (or what the CMOS might think about that), I think that the kernel should REALLY, totally ignore an ide and/or hdX if so explicitely requested with a kernel parameter.
Anything I missed?
-- Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
PS Sorry if this is a FAQ (it seems so) -- I just can't find a satisfactory answer anywhere as to why explicit parameters like this are ignored and want to ask to change this. Or, I cannnot find the solution for this problem and get my damn ide0 NOT probed.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |