lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
    On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:22:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:14:14 -0400
    > Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
    >
    > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    > > >
    > > > Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from Signed-off-by:
    > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    > > > +
    > > > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a
    > > > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can
    > > > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog.
    > >
    > > Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
    >
    > What, no Tested-by: ?

    Heh. Indeed. I think there's room for both fwiw.

    Dave

    --
    http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-01 20:31    [W:0.020 / U:30.384 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site