lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:22:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:14:14 -0400
> Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > >
> > > Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from Signed-off-by:
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > +
> > > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a
> > > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can
> > > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog.
> >
> > Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
>
> What, no Tested-by: ?

Heh. Indeed. I think there's room for both fwiw.

Dave

--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-01 20:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans