Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:06:54 -0400 | From | Mathieu Desnoyers <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table |
| |
* Andi Kleen (andi@firstfloor.org) wrote: > > It's not clear to me why either of those things are necessary. An > > example please? > > It's certainly possible that a global flag would need to be tested > more than once. > > I guess it would work if a symbol is associated with a single > definition. e.g. if there is a DEFINE_COND_CALL() somewhere > and the individual cond calls reference it. >
Yes, but as you have probably understood, I want to have everything embedded at the cond_call() site rather than polluting the rest of the code with declarations.
Also, if we have the same cond_calls in different modules, in which module shall it be defined ?
-- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |