Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 May 2007 17:50:18 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: lguest re-review |
| |
On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:24:08 +1000 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send > > the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations > > about the author's personal appearance, etc. > > Thanks Andrew, > > This means I can finally ack this patch (thanks Eric): > > From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[PATCH] paravirt: Add startup infrastructure for paravirtualization" > > This reverts commit c9ccf30d77f04064fe5436027ab9d2230c7cdd94.
I don't get it. Does lguest no longer need this code, or will it be reintroduced with an lguest merge, or something else? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |