[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] firewire: handling of cards, buses, nodes
    Pekka Enberg wrote:
    > On 5/2/07, Stefan Richter <> wrote:
    >> I looked around a bit with grep -R and a few search terms but didn't
    >> find something definite. Is there any other user of a crc16_itu_t or
    >> crc_ccitt or whatever which operates on a (CPU byte ordered) u32[]
    >> instead of on a (network byte ordered) u8[]?
    > I was referring to this:

    That works. If you look closely, you can see that the ITU-T table is just

    crc_itu_t_table[i] = bitrev16(crc_ccitt_table[bitrev8(i)])

    but that's a expensive enough operation that I think it deserves its own
    table. Especially if there's another driver out there that needs this.

    > On 5/2/07, Stefan Richter <> wrote:
    >> The only value in having a shared implementation would be a potentially
    >> smaller kernel. Sharing it to ensure correctness is not an issue;
    >> fw-topology.c::crc16_itu_t is simply the one in IEEE 1212 table 5.
    >> Performance is also not an issue (if better algorithms exist) because
    >> the FireWire stack uses it only infrequently on a moderate amount of
    >> data.
    > Yeah, it's not a biggie, but we do have a tradition of putting
    > generally useful things into lib/ so that everyone doesn't invent
    > their own.

    I'll pull in Ivo's patch and add it to the firewire branch.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-08 00:07    [W:0.035 / U:0.908 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site