Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 6 May 2007 15:40:10 +0530 | From | "Satyam Sharma" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] relay: use plain timer instead of delayed work |
| |
Hi Tom,
On 5/6/07, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@comcast.net> wrote: > [...] > relay doesn't need to use schedule_delayed_work() for waking readers > when a simple timer will do. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@comcast.net> > [...] > diff --git a/include/linux/relay.h b/include/linux/relay.h > index 759a0f9..cac0732 100644 > --- a/include/linux/relay.h > +++ b/include/linux/relay.h > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct rchan_buf > size_t subbufs_consumed; /* count of sub-buffers consumed */ > struct rchan *chan; /* associated channel */ > wait_queue_head_t read_wait; /* reader wait queue */ > - struct delayed_work wake_readers; /* reader wake-up work struct */ > + struct timer_list timer; /* reader wake-up timer */ > struct dentry *dentry; /* channel file dentry */ > struct kref kref; /* channel buffer refcount */ > struct page **page_array; /* array of current buffer pages */
I suspect you could now safely get rid of the "#include <linux/wait.h>" at the top of relay.h too. And although timer.h comes via #include <linux/sched.h>, you might want to do that explicitly too.
Satyam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |