[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] MM: implement MADV_FREE lazy freeing of anonymous memory
    Nick Piggin wrote:

    > OK, sure. I think we need more numbers though.

    Thinking about the issue some more, I think I know just the
    number we might want to know.

    It is pretty obvious that the kernel needs to do less work
    with the MADV_FREE code present. However, it is possible
    that userspace needs to do more work, by accessing pages
    that are not in the CPU cache, or in another CPU's cache.

    In the test cases where you see similar performance on the
    workload with and without the MADV_FREE code, are you by any
    chance seeing lower system time and higher user time?

    I think that maybe for 2.6.22 we should just alias MADV_FREE
    to run with the MADV_DONTNEED functionality, so that the glibc
    people can make the change on their side while we figure out
    what will be the best thing to do on the kernel side.

    I'll send in a patch that does that once Linus has committed
    your most recent flood of patches. What do you think?

    Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
    the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group
    calls the other unpatriotic.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-07 00:47    [W:0.023 / U:0.324 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site