Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 May 2007 01:13:07 +0400 | From | Anton Vorontsov <> | Subject | Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class) |
| |
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:39:40PM +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote: > > > secondary notion too, as that is common. It would be generic. > > > > > > Or maybe I just didn't get the idea behind the "type" attribute :-) > > > > > > I'd appreciate if these were documented in the text file. > > > > I think I got the start point of confusion. It's indeed bad to call such > > power supply type as AC. Maybe I should it rename to ADAPTER? Or WALL? > > or MAINS?
Philipp, much thanks! MAINS indeed feels perfect for that.
-- Anton Vorontsov email: cbou@mail.ru backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |