lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:39:40PM +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> > > secondary notion too, as that is common. It would be generic.
> > >
> > > Or maybe I just didn't get the idea behind the "type" attribute :-)
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate if these were documented in the text file.
> >
> > I think I got the start point of confusion. It's indeed bad to call such
> > power supply type as AC. Maybe I should it rename to ADAPTER? Or WALL?
>
> or MAINS?

Philipp, much thanks! MAINS indeed feels perfect for that.

--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@mail.ru
backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-06 23:19    [W:0.069 / U:1.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site