[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386: always clear bss
    Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> writes:

    > BTW, I should have marked this as an RFC comment, rather than an actual
    > submission. We don't need it for .22.
    >> NAK.
    >> Skipping the segment register load is likely fine.
    >> Supporting V!=P at startup_32 is not.
    > Why?
    >> Assuming that we have a stack at startup_32 is not.
    >> If you want to figure out where the kernel is loaded you can do
    >> (from arch/i386/boot/head.S)
    > Yes, that's more or less the same code, aside from using 0x40(%esi) as a
    > stack. Would that be OK here?

    Using 0x40 as a stack would be ok.

    There are issues with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE and V!=P that I'm not
    comfortable with yet, because we can't tell the difference.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-04 17:25    [W:0.021 / U:21.604 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site