Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 31 May 2007 18:24:40 -0700 | | From | Mark Fasheh <> | | Subject | Re: 2.6.22-rc3-mm1 - page_mkwrite() breakage |
| |
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:01:29AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > Ah, I didn't realise you were using that yet. I expect ocfs2 is using > VM_CAN_INVALIDATE there anyway. > > Hmm, this becomes easier to deal with after page_mkwrite is merged with > ->fault. But for now, can we just lock the page at the do_wp_page site > as well, and change the API? All users I have seen want the page locked > there anyway...
Unfortunately that doesn't work for ocfs2 for exactly the same reasons page lock doesn't work during a write either - there's a cluster lock inversion and we might have to zero adjacent pages for an allocating write.
What's involved in merging it with ->fault?
Here's a nasty idea... Would it be valid for ->page_mkwrite to unlock the page, so long as it's returned in a locked state? Though, do we even need the page lock that early? It seemed to me that you were adding it for consistency reasons (I could be wrong though). --Mark
-- Mark Fasheh Senior Software Developer, Oracle mark.fasheh@oracle.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |