Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 May 2007 18:07:55 +0530 | From | "Satyam Sharma" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 4 |
| |
Hi Richard,
On 5/25/07, Richard Purdie <richard@openedhand.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:15 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: > > Richard, can you please provide perf. results for this patch also? > > Also, can you please mail back latest version of your LZO patch? In > > meantime, I will try to include benchmarking support to the > > 'compress-test' module. > > This version is 15% slower at decompression and about equal on > compression.
I hope you tested your _safe variant against this, Nitin has done away with the _unsafe version in this patch. Also, are you using your crypto lzo-support + tcrypt changes ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/1/303 ) to benchmark these?
> I am however still strongly of the opinion that we should just use the > version in -mm (which is my latest version).
Right, if the difference is anything >10%, code cleanup does lose its attractiveness.
Satyam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |