lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Status of CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING?
    Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:29:39PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
    >> On May 23 2007 23:22, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    >>> And we need only two different inline levels (__always_inline and
    >>> "let the compiler decide"), not three (__always_inline, inline and
    >>> "let the compiler decide").
    >> "inline" is "let the compiler decide". If it is not, then it is "let the
    >> compiler decide, based on my bias that I think it should be inlined".
    >
    > Wrong.
    > "static" is "let the compiler decide".
    >
    and "inline" is "give the compiler a suggestion". Not more than that.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-24 19:23    [W:0.020 / U:0.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site