[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Status of CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING?
    Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:29:39PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
    >> On May 23 2007 23:22, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    >>> And we need only two different inline levels (__always_inline and
    >>> "let the compiler decide"), not three (__always_inline, inline and
    >>> "let the compiler decide").
    >> "inline" is "let the compiler decide". If it is not, then it is "let the
    >> compiler decide, based on my bias that I think it should be inlined".
    > Wrong.
    > "static" is "let the compiler decide".
    and "inline" is "give the compiler a suggestion". Not more than that.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-24 19:23    [W:0.042 / U:0.188 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site