Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 May 2007 11:16:13 +0200 | From | "Jan Blunck" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] file as directory |
| |
On 5/23/07, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote: > > So your question is, which mount takes priority on the lookup? It > probably should be the propagated real mount, rather than the > dir-on-file one, shouldn't it? >
Maybe this might belong into __link_path_walk() similar to the handling of symbolic links. If the real mount has always higher priority why do we bother in follow_mount() about it.
Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |