[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] file as directory
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Why do we want this?
> --------------------
> That depends on who you ask. My answer is this:
> 'foo.tar.gz/foo/bar' or
> 'foo.tar.gz/contents/foo/bar'
> or something similar.
> Others might suggest accessing streams, resource forks or extended
> attributes through such an interface. However this patch only deals
> with the non-directory case, so directories would be excluded from
> that interface.

here's a possibly stupid question. What about symlinks to dirs? namely
the shells tend to treat them differently if postfixed with a slash or not.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-23 01:31    [W:0.149 / U:2.564 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site