[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] file as directory
    Miklos Szeredi wrote:
    > Why do we want this?
    > --------------------
    > That depends on who you ask. My answer is this:
    > 'foo.tar.gz/foo/bar' or
    > 'foo.tar.gz/contents/foo/bar'
    > or something similar.
    > Others might suggest accessing streams, resource forks or extended
    > attributes through such an interface. However this patch only deals
    > with the non-directory case, so directories would be excluded from
    > that interface.

    here's a possibly stupid question. What about symlinks to dirs? namely
    the shells tend to treat them differently if postfixed with a slash or not.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-23 01:31    [W:0.019 / U:23.492 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site