lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: bad networking related lag in v2.6.22-rc2

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> > ouch! a nearly 1 second delay got observed by the scheduler - something
> > is really killing your system!
>
> ah, you got the latency tracer from Thomas, as part of the -hrt patchset
> - that makes it quite a bit easier to debug. [...]

and ... you already did a trace for Thomas, for the softirq problem:

http://cybertek.info/taitai/trace.txt.bz2

this trace shows really bad networking related kernel activities!

gkrellm-5977 does this at timestamp 0:

gkrellm-5977 0..s. 0us : cond_resched_softirq (established_get_next)

2 milliseconds later it's still in established_get_next() (!):

gkrellm-5977 0..s. 2001us : cond_resched_softirq (established_get_next)

and the whole thing takes ... 455 msecs:

gkrellm-5977 0..s. 455443us+: cond_resched_softirq (established_get_next)

i think this suggests that you have tons of open sockets. What does
"netstat -ts" say on your box?

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-21 10:15    [W:0.334 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site