[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Ext3 vs NTFS performance
Theodore Tso <> writes:

> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:21:40PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Andrew Morton <> writes:
> > >
> > > Conceivably we could address this in the filesystem without mucking other
> > > things up. But I'd have thought the simplest damage-control would be to
> > > detect this pattern in samba and to then use glibc's fallocate().
> >
> > The advantage of detecting it in kernel would be that it would handle
> > Linux applications that do this (I suspect there are some) too.
> Um, which applications do you suspect? So we can hunt down those user
> space applications programmers and slap them silly? Or rather,
> unsilly, since that there's no good reason to ever suspect that
> writing a byte every 128k would result in a good allocation layout on disk?

Anything that uses glibc fallocate() ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-02 19:45    [W:0.182 / U:2.820 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site