[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Subjectsd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()]
    On Sat, May 19, 2007 21:04, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > Tejun Heo wrote:
    >> Yeah, if SCR registers are accessible, 0xff doesn't indicate the device
    >> isn't there, so the whole skip-0xff logic probably shouldn't apply in
    >> such cases, but we can also achieve pretty good result by just making
    >> the first reset tries a bit more aggressive.
    > So, here's the patch.
    > Paul, can you please test this patch without the previous patch? Indan,
    > this should reduce the resume delay. Please test. But you'll still
    > feel some added delay compared to 2.6.20 due to the mentioned
    > suspend/resume change.

    This removed the COMRESET errors indeed, and with sd_resume()
    disabled everything is speedy again (2s or so. Still a desktop pc).
    I didn't try with sd_resume enabled.

    Everything seems to work fine without sd_resume(), so why is it needed?



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-20 00:35    [W:0.023 / U:4.816 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site