[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Bug 8501] udivdi3 absence with gcc-4.3.0 on kernels & 2.6.22.-rc1
> gcc-4.3 appears to have cunningly converted this:
> static inline void timespec_add_ns(struct timespec *a, u64 ns)
> {
> ns += a->tv_nsec;
> while(unlikely(ns >= NSEC_PER_SEC)) {
> ns -= NSEC_PER_SEC;
> a->tv_sec++;
> }
> a->tv_nsec = ns;
> }
> into a divide-by-1000000000 operation, so it emits a call to udivdi3
> and we
> don't link.

Exactly. It obviously is a bug in the kernel that it depends
on certain compiler optimisations that it doesn't have direct
control over to happen or not. OTOH, GCC's behaviour here is
probably a non-optimal code issue; it doesn't seem to take the
unlikely() into account when doing the loop transform.

> I expect that this optimisation will remain in gcc-4.3

If someone files a *useable* problem report it most likely
will be taken care of, actually.

> and we'll end up
> having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc
> releases, which isn't altogether desirable.

Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(

> I suspect we'll need to fix this
> fairly urgently, and to backport the fix into a number of kernel
> releases.

If it is 4.3 only, you could instead try to work *with* the GCC
people. It _is_ very fragile code of course, it wouldn't hurt
to replace it with something better.

> We use the above idiom in several places. A suitable fix might be to
> hunt
> down those various sites and then make them call a helper function
> which
> does
> if (unlikely(ns >= NSEC_PER_SEC)) {
> do_div(...)
> }
> (Better would be to inline the comparison and to uninline the do_div(),
> if it's a 32-bit arch. Doing all this in a backportable fashion may
> prove tricky)

Perhaps putting a compiler barrier in there would be enough -- like
an empty asm() that takes the loop variable as input.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-19 01:43    [W:0.046 / U:3.556 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site