lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
On 5/18/07, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> We can solve the problem without doing that, and keeping the same
> vector number during migration keeps x86 from scaling.

I mean ioapic level irq couls be limited. new device could use MSI or
HT irq directly and less irq routing problem.

> Personally I would prefer to disallow irq migration.
? typo?
For amd platform with different hypertransport chain on different
nodes, irq migration is needed.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-18 20:11    [W:0.049 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site